Ticket #240 (closed planned_task: obsolete)
BASE_LAYOUT_R0
| Reported by: | Astea | Owned by: | peko |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | 3 | Milestone: | M02b_PRE2b |
| Component: | BASE_GUI_LIB | Version: | 2.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | peko | |
| Category: | unknown | Effort: | 1.5 |
| Importance: | 20 | Ticket_group: | |
| Estimated Number of Hours: | Add Hours to Ticket: | ||
| Billable?: | Total Hours: | ||
| Analysis_owners: | pap | Design_owners: | tanya, mira |
| Imp._owners: | tanya | Test_owners: | |
| Analysis_reviewers: | tanya | Changelog: | |
| Design_reviewers: | Alex | Imp._reviewers: | peko |
| Test_reviewers: | Analysis_score: | 3.5 | |
| Design_score: | 4 | Imp._score: | 0 |
| Test_score: | 0 |
Description (last modified by tanya) (diff)
wiki page: BASE_LAYOUT_R0 - effort: 1.5d
Change History
comment:1 Changed 17 years ago by todor
- Owner changed from Astea to todor
- Status changed from new to analyzing
comment:4 Changed 17 years ago by Tanya
- Owner changed from todor to Tanya
- Status changed from analysis_accepted to designing
comment:9 Changed 17 years ago by pavlina
- Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s2c_design_ok
3.5p. It is understandable and clear.
comment:10 Changed 17 years ago by milo
- Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s1c_analysis_ok
2p - the approach is good, but this library needs better design
Hmm... i dont think that the design is ok because of the following:
- There are no demonstrating unit tests (or at least not listed).
- Properties are not written in correct case.
- The listed classes need more descriptions - at least what their purpose is.
- There is actually an implementation of this one, but it should be better designed.
- In general, it is not clear enough how this library will be used, or how layout engines should be implemented.
It may not seem nice that I'm failing this one, but quality is not negotiable. Especially for things in BASE (their design affects more things).
comment:11 Changed 16 years ago by deyan
- Milestone changed from M02_PRE2 to M02b_PRE2b
Milestone change
comment:12 Changed 16 years ago by Tanya
- Design_owners set to Tanya
- Analysis_reviewers set to Tanya
- Analysis_score set to 0
- Test_score set to 0
- Design_score set to 0
- Imp._score set to 0
comment:14 Changed 16 years ago by Tanya
- Design_owners changed from Tanya to tanya
- Analysis_reviewers changed from Tanya to tanya
comment:16 Changed 16 years ago by Tanya
- Status changed from s2a_design_started to s2b_design_finished
comment:18 Changed 16 years ago by alex
- Category set to unknown
- Design_score changed from 0 to 4
- Design_reviewers set to Alex
- Status changed from s2b_design_finished to s2c_design_ok
- Description modified (diff)
comment:19 Changed 16 years ago by tanya
- Description modified (diff)
I think the design is good, I don't see any problems with it
comment:20 Changed 16 years ago by tanya
- Owner changed from Tanya to tanya
- Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started
comment:21 Changed 16 years ago by tanya
- Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished
comment:22 Changed 16 years ago by peko
- Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to s2c_design_ok
- Imp._reviewers set to peko
There aren't any unit tests.
comment:23 Changed 16 years ago by peko
- Owner changed from tanya to peko
- Status changed from s2c_design_ok to s3a_implementation_started
comment:24 Changed 16 years ago by peko
- Status changed from s3a_implementation_started to s3b_implementation_finished
comment:25 Changed 16 years ago by peko
- Status changed from s3b_implementation_finished to s3c_implementation_ok
comment:26 Changed 16 years ago by pap
- Analysis_owners set to pap
- Analysis_score changed from 0 to 3.5
setting custom fields
comment:29 Changed 15 years ago by deyan
- Status changed from s3c_implementation_ok to closed
- Resolution set to obsolete
Batch update from file query-obsoleted.csv
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
